Wednesday, October 24, 2018

Hillary Clinton: Brett Kavanaugh Will Take America Back to the 1850s

Hillary is rumored to be taking another stab at the presidency. Word on the street is she already has her favorite Doctor Evil costume pressed and ready for her Inauguration Day. These are still rumors, but the pantsuited succubus is certainly acting like a candidate already.
In fact, she caught the Amtrak from the pits of Hell to Pittsburgh to throw shade at the Donald’s Supreme Court pick. Claiming he will take us back to the 1850s.
Let me say a word about the nomination of Judge Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. This nomination holds out the threat of devastating consequences for worker’s rights, civil rights, LGBT rights, women’s rights, including those to make our own health decisions.
It is a blatant attempt by this administration to shift the balance of the Court for decades and to reverse decades of progress.
I used to worry that they wanted to turn the clock back to the 1950s. Now, I worry they want to turn it back to the 1850s. These will be urgent fights. Stakes could not be higher.
Hill still hasn’t gotten the message. I guess we’ll have to remind her once again.
www.louderwithcrowder.com

Hillary Clinton Tries to Take Credit for #MeToo

At any bar in America on a Friday night, you can see an old rocker who used to be big in the 80s. Even though they are way past their prime, in their senile minds, you get the feeling they still think they matter. That’s who Hillary Clinton is. She’s basically the bass player from Winger playing Zito’s Crab Shack. Only instead of reliving the glory days, she keeps reliving her humiliating 2016 defeat. Blaming everyone she can.
Though during this week’s performance, she sounded like she was taking credit for #MeToo. Yes, the same Hillary who is a close confidant of Harvey Weinstein. And married to alleged rapist Bill Clinton. Her losing to Trump is the real reason for #MeToo.
Hillary Clinton has taken credit for ‘accelerating’ the #MeToo movement, despite her close and longtime ties to disgraced movie mogul Harvey Weinstein, whose downfall triggered the cultural reckoning.
Clinton’s remarks were caught on video at the Manhattan women’s club The Wing on Tuesday night, where she continued to cast blame over her loss in the 2016 presidential election.
Someone at the talk asked: ‘In an alternative reality, if you were president today in 2018, do you think the #MeToo movement would’ve still happened?’
‘I believe that it was a wave that was building and building and building,’ Clinton responded. ‘I think my losing probably accelerated that wave, but the wave was coming.’
It’s not like Madam Cankles is the first to try and give herself credit for #MeToo. Though I can think of a few who think she is less the effect. More the cause:
Let’s be real here. The only time #MeToo is used in a conversation about Hillary Clinton is in response to someone saying, “I wish she would go away.”
Dearest Hillary,
Don’t believe the haters. You are the answer to America’s most burning question: who should be the titular leader the Democrats so desperately crave? Stiffen your upper lip. Have your most matronly pantsuit steamed and pressed. Shake out that coif with pride, sister. Listen to what your black, battle-worn heart whispers in the darkness. Be the shining beacon of hope Democrats can mindlessly follow to electoral victory!
With the affirmations firmly set, let’s review the following pettish trifle together. The New York Times hired a toddler to pen a rather negative OpEd about you, putting the small-minded girl to work in the corner of her daycare, armed with nothing but construction paper and a thick crayon. It wasn’t even burnt sienna. Don’t get me started. Anyway, Michelle Cottle had this to say about you, Hillary, the smartest woman who has ever touched buckled-boot to soil:
This is the sort of moral arrogance and self-justification that has long troubled even many Democrats about Mrs. Clinton. The former first lady, turned senator, turned secretary of state may have been one of the most qualified nominees ever to run for president. But widespread ambivalence about her among not only swing voters but also her own base set the stage for her to lose the presidency to arguably the least qualified individual ever to hold that office.
My heart just breaks. A single tear slides down my face as I write this letter to you, Madam Clinton. You were then — and are now — the most qualified, most dignified, most enlightened Democrat since Ted Kennedy wrung the waters of Chappaquiddick from his coat. Let no one, especially a petulant kindergartner at the New York Times, convince you otherwise.
Yes, you lost the presidency to a reality television star who couldn’t use proper capitalization to save a nation. Sure, the defeat was unexpected. But why was it unexpected? Everyone thought you would clinch the presidency just as you clinched the server-wiping cloth or something. The presidency was surely yours! Because you, Madam Secretary, deserved to lead this country to its most chaotic years of social justice jihadism.
And only you still can. That “widespread ambivalence” among “swing voters” and “your own base” the glue-sniffing Michelle Cottle dribbled on about, is nothing but an opportunity. Those voters are people waiting for your guidance. Like sheep waiting for the slaughter shepherd. They’re hungry for REAL leadership. I suggest you summon John Podesta and Lady Gaga for a spirit cooking. Talk about your next move over sips of fetal blood. Ruminate about better passwords. Wouldn’t want those nosy ruskies hacking into your servers again, am I right?
…a spokesman for the Republican National Committee boasted of his party’s plan to hang her around Democrats’ neck in the midterms: “We’re going to make them own her.”
Tish tosh! Such plans are decoys! The RNC secretly fears your abundant genius. The mere utterance of your name sends shivers of fear down the collective spines of every elected and non-elected man, woman or gender-fluid dog-playing pervert with an (R) following their name. The Democrats are proud of you. Why else did they want you to run for president not once, but twice? Why else if not for a confidence that you, Madam Hillary, would win the hearts of the American people?
Americans are a forgiving, loving people. The scandals of Benghazi, secret bathroom-stashed servers, and a husband who may or may not have “raped” people is in the past. Don’t believe these new #MeToo adherents. Rape is just a fancy word for… well, I’ll get back to you on that. These new wide-eyed Democrats, in some cases the literal wide-eyed Democrats like Nina Pinta Santa Maria Cortez, they haven’t the fortitude to lead a party, much less a nation. Nothing compares, NOTHING COMPARES, to you!
So please, Hillary Clinton, I implore you. Let not these cruel open letters by rags like The New York Times diminish your ambitions. Heed not the caution thrown at you by Democrat “leaders.” Where would the Democrat Party be without you? Who would the Democrats be without your poise, your calm, your steadfast ways, your exemplary sense of pantsuited style? Who would the Democrat Party be without your pithy, split-tongue insults about deplorable baskets? You are a marketing sorceress. A branding demon. A moral compass which points ever to three-pronged victory.
Be seen, Madam Hillary. Lead. Shoulder the mantle of your own wicked greatness and take your Democrat Party exactly where it deserves.
HilLIARy Clinton. Lost to Trump. Thank the lawd

Friday, December 4, 2015


Hillary Clinton has regained a lead over Bernie Sanders, topping him by a 28 point margin. Hillary leads Sanders 58% to 30% and O'Malley registering at 2%. According to polls Hillary is widely seen as better able to handle matters of foreign policy than Sanders. According to CNN, Democratic voters reported that they trust Hillary most on foreign policy (74%)  and handling Isis (59%) and as best able to handle the responsibilities that come with being commander-in-chief (64%).
http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/04/politics/cnn-orc-poll-democrats-hillary-clinton-2016-election-democratic-primary/

Wednesday, December 2, 2015

Hillary Clinton Reacts to San Bernardino Shooting

 (Willie J. Allen, Jr. / AP)
(Willie J. Allen, Jr. / Associated Press)


Clinton responded quickly to the breaking news of the shooting on Twitter, urging "we must take action to stop gun violence" and stating she "refuses to accept this as normal". Hillary remains a firm stand on pushing the need for stricter gun control in light of the latest in a long string of mass shootings. Clinton was speaking about the need for gun control at a campaign stop in Florida when the attack on Inland Regional Services in San Bernardino, California started to unfold on Wednesday afternoon, according to ABC News' Liz Kreutz. Clinton told her supporters it is time to stand up to the gun lobby and spoke of common sense solutions to gun violence.


http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/12/hillary-clinton-san-bernardino-shooting-gun-control.